www.LoftusReport.com
exclusive:
Secret Files Prove Saddam Had WMD
Copyright, Nov. 13,
2007 by Atty. John Loftus
Contact John@LoftusReport.com
Phone: 727-821-5227,
fax: 727 894 1801
(1750 words)
Finally, there are
some definitive answers to the mystery of the missing WMD. Civilian volunteers, mostly retired
intelligence officers belonging to the non-partisan IntelligenceSummit.org, have been poring over the secret archives captured from Saddam
Hussein. The inescapable conclusion is this: Saddam really did have WMD after
all, but not in the way the Bush administration believed. A 9,000 word research
paper with citations to each captured document has been posted online at LoftusReport.com,
along with translations of the captured Iraqi documents, courtesy of Mr. Ryan Mauro and his friends.
This
Iraqi document research has been supplemented with satellite photographs and dozens of interviews, among them David
Gaubatz who risked radiation exposure to locate Saddam’s underwater WMD
warehouses , and John Shaw, whose brilliant detective work solved the puzzle of
where the WMD went. Both have
contributed substantially to solving one of the most difficult mysteries of our
decade.
The
absolutists on either side of the WMD debate will be more than a bit chagrinned
at these disclosures. The documents show a much more complex history than previously
suspected. The "Bush lied, people died" chorus has insisted that
Saddam had no WMD whatsoever after 1991 - and thus that WMD was no
good reason for the war. The Neocon diehards insist that, as in
Raiders of the Lost Ark, the treasure-trove is still out there somewhere,
buried under the sand dunes of Iraq. Each side is more than a little bit wrong
about Saddam's WMD, and each side is only a little bit right about what happened
to it.
The
gist of the new evidence is this: roughly one quarter of Saddam's WMD was
destroyed under UN pressure during the early to mid 1990's. Saddam sold
approximately another quarter of his weapons stockpile to his Arab
neighbors during the mid to late 1990's. The Russians insisted on
removing another quarter in the last few months before the war. The last
remaining WMD, the contents of Saddam's nuclear weapons labs, were still inside
Iraq on the day when the coalition forces arrived in 2003. His nuclear weapons equipment was hidden in
enormous underwater warehouses beneath the Euphrates River. Saddam’s entire nuclear inventory was later stolen
from these warehouses right out from under the Americans’ noses.
The theft of the unguarded Iraqi nuclear stockpile is perhaps, the worst
scandal of the war, suggesting a level of extreme incompetence and gross
dereliction of duty that makes the Hurricane Katrina debacle look like a model
of efficiency.
Without
pointing fingers at the Americans, the Israeli government now believes that
Saddam Hussein’s nuclear stockpiles have ended up in weapons dumps in Syria. Debkafile, a somewhat reliable private
Israeli intelligence service, has recently published a report claiming that the
Syrians were importing North Korean plutonium to be mixed with Saddam’s enriched
uranium. Allegedly, the Syrians were close to completing a warhead factory next
to Saddam’s WMD dump in Deir al Zour, Syria to produce hundreds, if not thousands, of super toxic “dirty bombs” that
would pollute wherever they landed in Israel for the next several thousands of
years. Debka alleged that it was this combination factory/WMD dump site which was
the target of the recent Israeli air strike in Deir al Zour province..
Senior
sources in the Israeli government have privately confirmed to me that the recent
New York Times articles and satellite photographs about the Israeli raid on an
alleged Syrian nuclear target in Al Tabitha, Syria were of the completely wrong location. Armed with this knowledge, I searched Google
Earth satellite photos for the rest of the province of Deir al Zour for a site
that would match the unofficial Israeli descriptions: camouflaged black factory
building, next to a military ammunition dump, between an airport and an
orchard. There is a clear match in only
one location, Longitude 35 degrees, 16 minutes 49.31 seconds North, Latitude 40 degrees, 3 minutes, 29.97
seconds East. Analysts and members of
the public are invited to determine for themselves whether this was indeed the
weapons dump for Saddam’s WMD.
Photos of this complex taken after the Israel raid appear to show
that all of the buildings, earthern blast berms, bunkers, roads, even the acres
of blackened topsoil, have all been dug up and removed. All that remains are
what appear to be smoothed over bomb craters. Of course, that is not of itself
definitive proof, but it is extremely suspicious.
It
should be noted that the American interrogators had accurate information about
a possible Deir al Zour location shortly after the war, but ignored it:
"An Iraqi dissident going by the name of "Abu
Abdallah" claims that on March 10, 2003, 50 trucks arrived in Deir Al-Zour, Syria after being loaded in Baghdad.
…Abdallah approached his friend who was
hesitant to confirm the WMD shipment,
but did after Abdallah explained what his sources
informed him of. The friend told him not to tell anyone about the
shipment."
These interrogation reports should be re-evaluated in light
of the recently opened Iraqi secret archives, which we submit are the best
evidence. But the captured document evidence
should not be overstated. It must be
emphasized that there is no one captured Saddam document which mentions both
the possession of WMD and the movement to Syria.
Moreover, many of
Saddam's own tapes and documents concerning chemical
and biological weapons are ambiguous. When read together as a mosaic whole, Saddam's
secret files certainly make a persuasive case of massive WMD acquisition right
up to a few months before the war. Not only was he buying banned precursors for
nerve gas, he was ordering the chemicals to make Zyklon B, the Nazis favorite
gas at Auschwitz. However odious and
well documented his purchases in 2002, there is no direct evidence of any CW or
BW actually remaining inside Iraq on the day the war started in 2003. As stated in more detail in my full report,
the British, Ukrainian and American secret services all believed that the
Russians had organized a last minute evacuation of CW and BW stockpiles from
Baghdad to Syria.
We know from
Saddam’s documents that huge quantities of CW and BW were in fact produced, and
there is no record of their destruction.
But absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Therefore, at least as to chemical and
biological weapons, the evidence is compelling, but not conclusive. There is no
one individual document or audiotape that contains
a smoking gun.
There
is no ambiguity, however, about captured tape ISGQ-2003-M0007379,
in which Saddam is briefed on his secret nuclear weapons project. This
meeting clearly took place in 2002 or afterwards: almost a decade after the State
Department claimed that Saddam had abandoned his nuclear weapons research.
Moreover the tape describes a laser enrichment process
for uranium that had never been known by the UN inspectors to even exist in
Iraq, and Saddam's nuclear briefers on the tape were Iraqi scientists who had never been on any weapons inspector’s
list. The tape explicitly discusses how
civilian plasma research could be used as a cover for military plasma research
necessary to build a hydrogen bomb.
When this tape came to the attention of the International
Intelligence Summit, a non-profit,
non-partisan educational forum focusing on global intelligence affairs, the
organization asked the NSA to verify the voiceprints of Saddam and his cronies,
invited a certified translator to present
Saddam’s nuclear tapes to the public, and then invited leading intelligence
analysts to comment.
At the direct request of the Summit, President Bush
promptly overruled his national intelligence adviser, John Negroponte, a career
State Department man, and ordered that the rest of the captured Saddam tapes
and documents be reviewed as rapidly as possible.
The Intelligence Summit asked that Saddam's tapes and documents be posted on a public website so that Arabic-speaking volunteers
could help with the translation and analysis.
At first, the public website seemed like a good idea.
Another document was quickly discovered, dated November 2002, describing an
expensive plan to remove radioactive contamination
from an isotope production building. The document cites the return of UNMOVIC inspectors as the reason for cleaning up the
evidence of radioactivity. This is not far from a smoking gun: there were not
supposed to be any nuclear production plants in Iraq in 2002.
Then a barrage of
near-smoking guns opened up. Document after document from Saddam's files was
posted unread on the public website, each one describing how to make a nuclear bomb in more detail than the last. These
documents, dated just before the war, show that Saddam had accumulated just
about every secret there was for the construction of nuclear weapons. The Iraqi
intelligence files contain so much accurate information on the atom bomb that
the translators’ public website had to be closed for reasons of national
security.
If Saddam had nuclear weapons facilities, where was he
hiding them? Iraqi informants showed US
investigators where Saddam had constructed huge underwater storage facilities
beneath the Euphrates River. The tunnel
entrances were still sealed with tons of concrete. The US investigators who approached the sealed entrances were
later determined to have been exposed to radiation. Incredibly, their reports
were lost in the postwar confusion, and Saddam’s underground nuclear storage sites
were left unguarded for the next three years. Still, the eyewitness testimony about the sealed underwater
warehouses matched with radiation exposure is strong circumstantial evidence
that some amount of radioactive material was still present in Iraq on the day
the war began.
Our volunteer researchers discovered the actual movement order from the Iraqi high command ordering all the remaining special equipment to be moved into the underground sites only a few weeks before the onset of the war. The date of the movement order suggests that President Bush, who clearly knew nothing of the specifics of the underground nuclear sites, or even that a nuclear weapons program still existed in Iraq, may have been accidentally correct about the main point of the war: the discovery of Saddam’s secret nuclear program, even in hindsight, arguably provides sufficient legal justification for the previous use of force.
Saddam’s nuclear documents compel any reasonable person
to the conclusion that, more probably than not, there were in fact nuclear WMD
sites, components, and programs hidden inside Iraq at the time the Coalition
forces invaded. In view of these newly discovered
documents, it can be concluded, more
probably than not, that Saddam did have a nuclear weapons program in 2001-2002,
and that it is reasonably certain that he would have continued his efforts
towards making a nuclear bomb in 2003 had he not been stopped by the Coalition
forces. Four years after the war began,
we still do not have all the answers, but we have many of them. Ninety percent
of the Saddam files have never been read, let alone translated. It is time to utterly reject the
conventional wisdom that there were no WMD in Iraq and look to the best evidence:
Saddam’s own files on WMD. The truth is
what it is, the documents speak for themselves.
John Loftus is President of IntelligenceSummit.org,
which is entirely free of government funding, and depends solely upon private
contributions for its support. The full research
paper on Iraqi WMD, along with the supporting documents and photographs can be
found at www.LoftusReport.com